No. Our approach is to evaluate first and recommend treatment only when it is clinically appropriate, not to move every patient through the same set of services. This matters for your cases because it protects the credibility of the documentation your firm relies on.

In practice, this looks like:

• A comprehensive initial evaluation to establish what is actually going on
• Testing recommendations based on the individual's presentation, not a standard package
• Treatment plans built only around findings that support clinical need
• Clear documentation when no further treatment is warranted, which can be just as useful to a case as documentation supporting ongoing care

This conservative, evidence-based posture is intentional. Overtreatment invites scrutiny, and our documentation is built to withstand that scrutiny because it reflects genuine clinical necessity rather than a routine service menu.